Vanessa 
The political landscape within Nigeria’s Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is witnessing renewed tensions as Lere Olayinka, media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has declared that his principal will actively oppose former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s potential bid for the presidency in 2027.
Background of the Rift
The discord between Atiku Abubakar and Nyesom Wike traces back to the 2023 presidential election cycle. Atiku, as the PDP’s presidential candidate, opted for former Delta State Governor Ifeanyi Okowa as his running mate, overlooking Wike, who was a strong contender for the position. Atiku defended his choice by stating that a party committee recommended three candidates, ranking Okowa first, Wike second, and former Akwa Ibom Governor Udom Emmanuel third. He emphasized that he selected the top candidate from this list.
Wike’s Position and Olayinka’s Statements
In response to Atiku’s recent remarks justifying his 2023 vice-presidential selection, Lere Olayinka took to social media to express Wike’s stance. Olayinka asserted that Wike has no regrets about not being chosen and is determined to ensure Atiku’s failure in any future presidential endeavors. He stated, “Two years after making the PDP lose a presidential election it could have won, Atiku is giving reasons he did not pick Wike as his running mate and that he has no regrets.”
Implications for the PDP
This public exchange highlights the ongoing internal strife within the PDP. Olayinka previously accused Atiku of leading a rebellion against the party in 2014, which he claims contributed to the PDP’s loss of power. He remarked, “PDP’s issues started in 2003 when Atiku as Vice President of Nigeria frustrated the PDP’s efforts to win Lagos State.”
The escalating war of words between key figures in the PDP underscores the challenges the party faces in presenting a united front ahead of the 2027 elections. As internal disputes come to the forefront, the PDP’s ability to navigate these conflicts will be crucial in determining its future political trajectory.
